Free Book Online
Book Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society by Ren¨¦e C. Fox (2013-04-30)


Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society by Ren¨¦e C. Fox (2013-04-30)

2.2 (1483)

Log in to rate this item

    Available in PDF - DJVU Format | Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society by Ren¨¦e C. Fox (2013-04-30).pdf | Language: UNKNOWN

Sorry, description is temporarily unavailable.

3.2 (11731)
  • Pdf

*An electronic version of a printed book that can be read on a computer or handheld device designed specifically for this purpose.

Formats for this Ebook

Required Software Any PDF Reader, Apple Preview
Supported Devices Windows PC/PocketPC, Mac OS, Linux OS, Apple iPhone/iPod Touch.
# of Devices Unlimited
Flowing Text / Pages Pages
Printable? Yes

Book details

  • PDF | Unknown pages
  • Transaction Publishers (1768)
  • Unknown
  • 4
  • Other books

Read online or download a free book: Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society by Ren¨¦e C. Fox (2013-04-30)


Review Text

  • By Peter Oliphant on April 14, 2011

    Organ replacement brings unhappiness on everyone. This book is a narrative of the development of organ replacement in the United States during 1968-1990. After these many years of field research, the writers have given up this field of study because it is too emotionally rending. Their closing complaint is of " overly zealous medical and societal commitment to the endless perpetuation of life and to repairing and rebuilding people through organ replacement"(210). Organ replacement, being a life-and-death technology, has plunged the symbolic act of giving into social norms that bring unhappiness on donors, personnel, and recipients.Organ replacements have come from problematic sources and have had problematic results. Animals, anencephalic infants, cadavers, living donors, and artifices (like the Jarvik artificial heart) were the sources to date. In results, the body rejects transplants, whether single or multiple organs, transplants within the body, or transplants among bodies. Anti-rejection drugs like Cyclosporine and FK506 had effects that interact, disable, and kill the recipients. Moratoria on natural and artificial replacements resulted.Suffering and death in organ replacement raise religious and ethical problems. A universal cultural complex is the "gift complex," first described by Marcel Mauss in the 1920's. Gift-giving everywhere in the world has these social norms: one must give, accept, return, and redouble a gift. Plunging this symbolic act into the normative system of organ replacement contaminates both donors and recipients. First, the obligations to give and to receive bring pressure to cooperate in the process. But, second, the obligations to return and redouble a gift are impossible to fulfill.Organ replacement converts gift-giving into a market. Live donors generally resist donation of own or other's organs and there is a natural shortage of cadavers, so there is a shortage. Resulting market forces include requiring patients and families be "offered the opportunity to consent," redefinition of brain death, largely ineffective laws against commercial marketing of organs, and the transition of the field away from service to the critically ill and toward services to those most likely to survive.Egalitarianism is the rationale for extending organ replacement to those who are most likely to survive becomes the rationale for generalizing organ replacement in the population. Price rationing becomes "non-price rationing," their evasive term for government death panels. They moan, "As poverty, homelessness, and lack of access to health care increase in our affluent country, is it justifiable for American society to be devoting so much of its intellectual energy and human and financial resources to the replacement of human organs"? (208)Their narrative everywhere exposes the government dog. NIH scandalizes medical universities and hospital corporations by offering enormous grants. Physicians, hospital, and universities want to win the race for technological prowess. Practitioners disguise their experiments as "therapy." All compromise by making themselves "gatekeepers," supposed to protect the patient (179). "Primary gatekeepers" are the medical establishment, who ignore safety data, write incompetent protocols, and lack technical expertise and sophisticated medical practice. "Secondary gate keepers" are the medical and administrative bureaucrats, like the government overseers who fund these experiments but are too august and sacred to submit to even an interview when the subjects die. "Tertiary gatekeepers" are the journalists, editors, peer reviewers, and social scientists who create unrealistic expectations of "wonder drugs," and "miracles," or just look on ("participant observation") with a patient tolerance that hopes for the best. All the gatekeepers meet, study, discuss, and fail to act responsibly.

  • Name:
    The message text*: